Legal Opinion

Twogood v. Hoyt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1880PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Calhoun. Ejectment. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, C. J.

The plaintiff brought ejectment to recover “a piece of land four rods front and rear and of equal width across block one hundred and one, next to and adjoining lot twenty-one, on the north of said lot twenty-one, in said block one hundred and one, on the Warner addition to the'village of Albion, according to the recorded plat thereof. It being understood to convey a piece of land four rods by eight rods formerly sold by Margaret Morgan to Eunice Pryor and designated on said plat as lot number twenty-two in said block one hundred and one.” That the plaintiff proved a record title to lot…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Purkiss v. BensonMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Farabaugh v. RhodeMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Wilmarth v. WoodcockMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Hoffman v. City of Port HuronMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Fletcher v. Thunder Bay River Boom Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Arnold v. BrechtelMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API