Legal Opinion
Ponce v. Marr
California Supreme Court
Decided October 11, 1956No. S. F. 19283PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
This cause was transferred to this court on its own motion. A trial in the Superior Court in and for the County of San Mateo resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff. On appeal the judgment was reversed by the District Court of Appeal. (Ponce v. Marr, (Cal.App.) 295 P.2d 43.) A hearing was ordered because of the italicized portion of the following quotation concerning the continuing effect of an opinion and decision of the District Court of Appeal after an order of transfer to this court:
“An excellent explanation of the distinction between an attempt to show the terms of an instrument by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Caminetti v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Marriner v. DennisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Foster v. KeatingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Chavez v. SargentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- R. J. Cardinal Co. v. RitchieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Ambrosini v. Alisal Sanitary DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Miro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Immerman v. ImmermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.