Legal Opinion

Rash v. Metzger

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 28, 1929No. 3947PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

Rash had been adjudged a bankrupt. His schedules showed unsecured claims amounting to $468,-526.63 and assets which later were sold for $169.75. In due course he applied for a discharge and on formal proof of notice to creditors it was granted. Metzger, a creditor of Rash and his trustee in bankruptcy, promptly petitioned the court to revoke the discharge on allegations that it was obtained through fraud and without notice to many creditors.

At the hearing it was shown that the addresses of only six of the eighty-one creditors listed in the schedules were given with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re BimbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1903
  2. In re CuthbertsonDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1912
  3. In re RudnickDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1899
  4. In re Goldenberg & HalbertDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1923

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re ZimmerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1945
  2. In Re IngraoDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1930
  3. In re StilwellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  4. Sherman & Son v. CorinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1934
  5. In Re EarlyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API