Legal Opinion

In re Rudnick

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided May 1, 1899No. 191PublishedCited by 12 opinions

In Bankruptcy.

1Opinion of the Court

LOWELL, District Judge.

This is a petition to set aside a composition. The address of the petitioning creditor was erroneously stated by mistake in the bankrupt’s schedule, and hence the petitioner received no notice "of the bankruptcy proceedings: He did not prove his debt, and the bankrupts deposit did not cover any dividend thereon. It 'is contended by the bankrupt that the composition cannot be set aside except in pursuance of the provisions of section 13 of the bankrupt act; that is to say, unless fraud was practiced in the procuring of the composition, which is not charged in this case.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re DupeeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1871

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In the Matter of NEWPORT HARBOR ASSOCIATES, D/B/A Newport Harbor Treadway, Inc., Etc. and James W. Kirby, Etc., Debtors, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  2. In Re Isidor Klein, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  3. Rash v. MetzgerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
  4. In re HammondDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1899
  5. In re AasandDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API