In re Goldenberg & Halbert
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
In Bankruptcy. In the matter of Goldenberg & Halbert, bankrupts. On motion to dismiss petition to set aside order granting discharge. Motion denied.
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, District Judge.
It appears by the petition of the Textile Banking Company, Inc., in support of the rule, that a petition for discharge of the bankrupts was filed and made returnable April 21, 1922; that thereafter, on May 19, 1922, before the referee, the bankrupt Goldenberg admitted under oath that, on behalf of himself and his copartner, he had issued a false financial statement in writing; that, pending endeavors on the part of the creditors to raise a fund to oppose a discharge of the bankrupts and employ the attorney for the trustee as their attorney, it was verbally agreed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re Louisville Nat. Banking Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
- In re BimbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1903
- In re CuthbertsonDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1912
- In re ApplegateDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1916
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rash v. MetzgerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
- In Re IngraoDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1930
- Sherman & Son v. CorinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1934
- In re LansleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- In Re EarlyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.