Legal Opinion

Allworth v. Muskegon Traction & Lighting Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1905No. Docket No. 50PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Muskegon; Russell, J. Case by David Allworth against the Muskegon Traction & Lighting Company for personal injuries. There was judgment for defendant on a demurrer to the declaration, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.

This case was commenced by declaration to recover for personal injuries received by plaintiff from coming in collision with a street car owned by defendant. The defendant interposed a demurrer to the declaration. This demurrer was sustained, and plaintiff was given an opportunity to amend his declaration. This he did not do. Judgment was entered against him, and the case is brought here by writ of error.

It is claimed by plaintiff the declaration states a cause of action, while defendant claims it does not. The declaration is very long. If it states a cause of action at all, it is to be found…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Richter v. HarperMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Denman v. JohnstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Labarge v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Rouse v. Detroit Electric RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Tunison v. WeadockMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vought v. Michigan United Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Campe v. Chicago City Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1910
  3. Clark v. Jackson Consolidated Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API