Legal Opinion

Gal v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 26, 1952No. 8119; Entry Nos. 720153/1; 708931; 859096/2PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

Various importations of aluminum metal covered paper were entered on behalf of the plaintiff at values which were stated to represent the export values of said merchandise. In the cases of reappraisement 139494-A and reappraisement 139535-A, the merchandise was appraised on the basis of foreign value, while cost of production formed the basis of appraisement of the merchandise covered by reappraisement 140802-A. In each instance, the appraised values constituted advances over the entered values, and an appeal for reappraisement was filed. The three appeals thus resulting were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. MassinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. WeckerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. United States v. GalUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  4. United States v. Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1941
  5. Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chicago Bird & Cage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Gal v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  3. Gal v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  4. Gal v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  5. Reliance International Mfg., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API