United States v. Gal
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Cline, Judge:
This is an application for review of the decision of the trial judge in Nicholas Gal et al. v. United States, Reap. Dec. 5995, as modified by Reap. Dec. 6005, and relates to the value of aluminum metal covered' paper, exported from Germany in 1935 and 1936 by Aluminiumwerk Tscheulin, G. m. b. H., Teningen, Germany.
These three appeals cover five different varieties <?f paper. Four varieties were appraised on the basis of foreign value, while the fifth type, described in Reappraisement 138496-A, was appraised on the basis of cost of production.
The trial judge held, in substance,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
- Robinson v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- United States v. New England Foil Corp.United States Customs Court · 1943
- United States v. F. C. Gerlach & Co.United States Customs Court · 1941
- United States v. Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Philipp Brothers Chemicals, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1961
- Gal v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- Henry v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- Mutual Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
- Gal v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.