Legal Opinion

Gal v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 27, 1956No. Reap. Dec. 8573; Entry Nos. 720153/1; 708931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

These cases are before me by virtue of an order entered May 26, 1952 (28 Cust. Ct. 656, Reap. Dec. 8119, appeal dismissed 30 Cust. Ct. 589, A. R. D. 15, and 33 Cust. Ct. 357, Abstract 58385), restoring them to the calendar for further bearing, specifically to afford plaintiff an opportunity to prove export value of similar merchandise.

The product in issue is aluminum metal-covered paper of various grades, entered and appraised as follows:

*557Invoice description Entered at reichs-marks per ream, 20 by 26" by 500 sheets Appraised at reichsmarks per 100 sq. meters

Reappraisement…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. MassinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. GalUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  3. United States v. Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1941
  4. Gal v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  5. Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gal v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API