United States v. Ross
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1DissentCook, Senior Judge
During the course of the post-trial interview1 appellant stated that he was not satisfied with his defense counsel. It is my considered belief that such a remark is a disavowal by the client of the attorney-client relationship which effectively terminates that relationship.2 Furthermore, I believe that in such a situation it is incumbent upon the staff judge advocate to take such steps as are necessary to ascertain the client’s desires concerning legal representation during the post-trial processing of his case.3
*882I am persuaded that appellant’s renunciation of his trial defense counsel…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Middendorf v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. PaleniusUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.