Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Ross

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided July 14, 1977No. SPCM 12306Published

1DissentCook, Senior Judge

During the course of the post-trial interview1 appellant stated that he was not satisfied with his defense counsel. It is my considered belief that such a remark is a disavowal by the client of the attorney-client relationship which effectively terminates that relationship.2 Furthermore, I believe that in such a situation it is incumbent upon the staff judge advocate to take such steps as are necessary to ascertain the client’s desires concerning legal representation during the post-trial processing of his case.3

*882I am persuaded that appellant’s renunciation of his trial defense counsel…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Middendorf v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. PaleniusUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API