Legal Opinion

State v. Kilgore

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 2002No. 71489-4PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, C.J.

— The sole issue before us is whether a trial court must conduct an evidentiary hearing before *290admitting evidence of “other crimes, wrongs, or acts” pursuant to ER 404(b). Division Two of the Court of Appeals concluded here that the trial court was not required to hold such a hearing. It reached this decision notwithstanding the fact that another division of the Court of Appeals had previously reached a contrary result in another case. We affirm Division Two’s decision in the instant case.

I

Mark P. Kilgore was charged in Pierce County Superior Court with four counts of child molestation and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. BennWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. RayWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. BarraganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State v. SutherbyWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Brundridge v. Fluor Federal Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Brundridge v. Fluor Federal Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. KilgoreWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State Of Washington v. George Abraham DillonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API