Egan v. Faendel
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Ail appeal is taken in this case by the defendant from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, denying his motion for a new trial. A sufficient statement of the case appears in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Ripley, Ch. J.
The plaintiff alleges that- the defendant agreed to furnish him all the ice he might require and need to use in his business for and during the year 1870 ; the defendant on the other hand alleges that he only agreed to furnish the ice required for certain iceboxes of the plaintiff. *233No third person was present at the making of the bargain, and as to what it really was, the testimony of the parties was conflicting, to say the least of it. The jury having found this issue for the plaintiff, and returned a verdict in his favor, and defendant’s motion for a new trial…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Humphrey v. HavensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1867
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ohlson v. ManderfeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Caulfield v. BogleSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1881