Ohlson v. Manderfeld
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant, who is sheriff of Brown county, from an order of the district court for that county, Cox, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
Appeal from an order denying a new trial. The grounds of the motion were — First, errors, in law occurring at the trial; second, that the verdict was not justified by the evidence. The action was for the wrongful taking and conversion of certain stacks of grain, alleged to be the property of the plaintiff. The answer denies plaintiff’s title, alleges title in one Conrad Gieseke, and justifies the taking by defendant, as sheriff, under an execution against Gieseke. The only error alleged to have occurred at the trial which was urged upon the argument, or which we deem necessary to notice, was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Butler v. WhiteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Barry v. McGradeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
- Moulton v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Egan v. FaendelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
3Cited by15 opinions
- Maher v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Lesher v. GetmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Austin v. RoseckeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Maroney v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- National Pole & Treating Co. v. GilkeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.