Legal Opinion

Caulfield v. Bogle

Supreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota

Decided October 15, 1881PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Lawrence Comity. ActioN to recover attorney’s fees. Tried by the court and findings of fact waived. Judgment for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtHudson, J.

This cause was tried by the court, a jury and the finding of facts having been waived.

It appears from this record that the grounds upon which a new trial was asked was “ that the evidence is insufficient to justify the decision,” and the exception to the decision overruling the. motion states no other.

The assignment of errors upon which this appeal is taken is as follows:

1st. — “ The decision of the court is against evidence.”

2nd. — “ The evidence was insufficient to justify the decision.”

This manner of presenting a case to this court for review is not in compliance with the Code of Civil…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Basset v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Brown v. TollesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Lewis v. CovillaudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Alviso v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  5. Tebbs v. WeatherwaxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pierce v. ManningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Franz Falk Brewing Co. v. Mielenz Bros.Supreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1888
  3. McCormack v. PhillipsSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1887
  4. Duggan v. DaveySupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1886
  5. Axiom Mining Co. v. WhiteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API