In Re Estate of Murdock
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hakman, C.:
Presented here are appeals from summary judgment holding that an antenuptial contract was valid and enforceable against a decedents estate. Consolidated with them are later appeals from awards of attorneys’ fees.
There is no dispute in the facts pertinent to the litigation.
On June 24, 1940, Marcellus Murdock and Paula Vaughan entered into the agreement in question. Marcellus was then fifty-seven years of age; Paula was forty-four. Marcellus had four adult children by a previous marriage which had been dissolved by death; Paula had no children.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hafer v. HaferSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Neddo v. NeddoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
- Cantrell v. LaidlawSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- Baldwin v. HambletonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- Fincham v. FinchamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Reznik v. McKee, TrusteeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- Jennings v. MurdockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- In Re the Estate of ReynoldsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- Schuh v. Educational Reading Services of Kansas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
- In Re Estate of HannahSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.