Legal Opinion

Cantrell v. Laidlaw

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 6, 1941No. 35,338PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This appeal involves the validity of an antenuptial contract, and grows out of the following:

J. S. Cantrell was married to Myrtle L. Ball on October 7, 1926, and they lived together as husband and wife until the death of J. S. Cantrell, intestate, on May 23, 1940. After his death his daughter, Pearl C. Laidlaw, was appointed and duly qualified as the administratrix of his estate. During the course of the administration of the estate a controversy arose with the widow respecting her interest in the estate, and a petition was filed in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hafer v. HaferSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  2. Hoard v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. Neddo v. NeddoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  4. Watson v. WatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  5. Watson v. WatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Davis v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  2. Estate of Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  3. Tice v. TiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  4. Clutter v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  5. Hartz v. HartzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API