Neddo v. Neddo
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Shawnee District Court. On May 4, 1888, the plaintiff filed his petition against the defendant for a divorce. On August 28, following, the defendant filed an answer and cross-petition.
Read the full summary
Error from Shawnee District Court. On May 4, 1888, the plaintiff filed his petition against the defendant for a divorce. On August 28, following, the defendant filed an answer and cross-petition. Subsequently, at different times, the plaintiff filed three amended petitions, the last one being filed December 12, 1889. On June 30, 1890, the defendant filed her answer and cross-petition, to which the plaintiff replied, and on July 19, 1890, a trial was commenced, but the case was not decided until September 8, 1891, when conclusions of fact and of law were filed, and judgment was rendered in…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Martin, O. J. :
I. The court found that the allegations of the plaintiff’s third amended petition were not supported by the evidence, and that the plaintiff *510abandoned the defendant April 2, 1887, without just cause or provocation. The evidence shows that at said time the plaintiff left the defendant, and caused a notice to be published in a newspaper at St. Mary’s, which circulated also at Rossville, (near which latter place the parties resided,) warning all persons not to give the defendant credit, or sell anything to her on plaintiff’s account, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hafer v. HaferSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Toby v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1866
- Hillyer v. DouglassSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
3Cited by32 opinions
- Appleby v. Estates of ApplebySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Stratton v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- King v. MollohanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
- Cantrell v. LaidlawSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- Williams v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1926
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.