Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Reynolds

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 18, 1998No. 79,619, 79,953PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Abbott, J.:

The above cases have been consolidated for appeal. Both cases involve the estate of James Daniel Henry Reynolds, Jr. Case No. 79,619 involves K.S.A. 59-2239 (the nonclaim statute) and the trial court’s refusal to enforce a New York court’s judgment against the estate of a Kansas decedent, James Daniel Henry Reyn olds, Jr. Case No. 79,953 is an appeal from the trial court’s order allowing an interim executor and attorney fees. The appellant, Marine Midland Bank, N.A., (Marine) is the successor in interest to Integrated Resources, Inc.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Durfee v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Tucker v. Hugoton Energy Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Nelson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. State, Department of Social & Rehabilitation Services v. PailletSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  3. Drake v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  4. State v. SandersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  5. Cresto v. CrestoSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API