Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United StateS v. Ware

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided May 8, 1978No. 33,182; NCM 75-2733Published

1ConcurrenceCook, Judge

Whenever the Uniform Code of Military Justice requires that a particular action be in writing, it expressly provides therefor, or the language of the reference necessarily implies a writing.1 The provisions of the Code regarding the convening of a court-martial and the detail of persons to it, such as the military judge, do not expressly, or by necessary implication, demand that the appointment be in writing. See Articles 22 through 29, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 822 through 829. That circumstance alone impresses me as indicating an intention on the part of Congress that the absence of a written…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. AlefUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  2. United States v. ClayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1951
  3. United States v. DeanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  4. United States v. AlbrightUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  5. United States v. HartsookUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API