Legal Opinion

United States v. Hartsook

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 2, 1965No. 18,051PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Kilday, Judge:

The accused was convicted of larceny of $1,000.00, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 921, and sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, total forfeitures, and confinement at hard labor for one year, and reduction to the grade of Private E-l. Intermediate appellate authorities approved and affirmed the findings and sentence without change.1 We granted his petition for review to consider the following issue:

Whether the officer who authorized the search was sufficiently informed of “the things to be seized” as required by law.

An…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. United States v. EzellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  2. United States v. StuckeyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  3. United States v. PenmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  4. United States v. DrewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
  5. United States v. NixUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API