Legal Opinion

Shasta Douglas Oil Co. v. Work

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 1963No. Civ. 10457PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN DYKE, *

This is an appeal from a portion of a judgment. Shasta Douglas Oil Company is hereafter referred to as “appellant.” The two respondents are hereafter referred to as “Work.”

Appellant sued Work for possession of land and for money due and money misappropriated, totaling over $16,000. Its claims were upheld. Work cross-complained and claimed that by appellant’s violation of California’s Antitrust Law he had suffered damages. The jury awarded him the sum of $33,375. The court trebled the award under the provisions of the statute and, offsetting appellant’s claims, gave Work a net…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nelson Radio & Supply Co., Inc. v. Motorola, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  2. United States v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Valencia v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Milton v. Hudson Sales Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. United States v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Clayworth v. Pfizer, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Zumbrun v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Richard S. Simpson v. Union Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  4. Classen v. WellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Kerr v. RoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API