Legal Opinion
Kerr v. Rose
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 8, 1990No. H004983PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COTTLE, J.
In this wrongful termination action, plaintiff Phillip E. Kerr sued his former employer, the former employer’s parent company, and various individuals for failing to recall him to work, as required by company policy, following his layoff from employment. The trial court dismissed the case after granting three separate motions for summary judgment. Kerr appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for disclosure of his former employer’s financial condition. We affirm the summary judgment in favor of the parent company, the summary judgment in favor of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Jacqueline R. Harrell Michael Harrell v. 20th Century Insurance Company, and Bradley ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Wilder v. Cody Country Chamber of CommerceWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Flait v. North American Watch Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- FSR Brokerage, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.