Legal Opinion

Young v. Mason-Walsh-Atkinsonkier Co.

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided June 6, 1940No. 50PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NETERER, District Judge.

The plaintiff, a laborer on the Grand Coulee Dam project, after alleging jurisdictional facts, says in substance: That defendant is constructing for the United States Government pursuant to written contract a dam across the Columbia river; that he was employed as a laborer and worked under • the general supervision of C. R. Durham, as the foreman; that prior to the injury complained of, he was working as a member of a “clean up” crew in salvaging unused materials and in gathering up and burning debris in and around “Block 40” of said dam; that while they worked under…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Young v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Prince v. Saginaw Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Gasch v. RoundsWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Kinsman v. Barton CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Garner v. Pacific Coast Coal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hammack v. Monroe Street Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Stefaniak v. BolandDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API