Kinsman v. Barton Company
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.
This is a personal injury case. The chief question involved is whether the plaintiff, at the time and place of her injury, was an invitee or a licensee. The trial court decided that she was the latter, took the case from the jury and entered a judgment dismissing the action.
The facts are these: The respondent operates a large meat packing plant in the city of Seattle. In connection therewith it constructed a garage for the purpose of housing its various trucks. Respondent’s employees had formed the habit, with respondent’s knowledge, of putting their private automobiles in the garage. There-…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Plummer v. DillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Indian Refining Co. v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Muench v. HeinemannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Gasch v. RoundsWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Gibson v. SziepienskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Potts v. AmisWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Schock v. Ringling Bros. Etc.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
- Dobbie v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Dotson v. HaddockWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- McCulloch v. HortonMontana Supreme Court · 1936
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.