Legal Opinion

Kinsman v. Barton Company

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1926No. 19947. En BancPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

This is a personal injury case. The chief question involved is whether the plaintiff, at the time and place of her injury, was an invitee or a licensee. The trial court decided that she was the latter, took the case from the jury and entered a judgment dismissing the action.

The facts are these: The respondent operates a large meat packing plant in the city of Seattle. In connection therewith it constructed a garage for the purpose of housing its various trucks. Respondent’s employees had formed the habit, with respondent’s knowledge, of putting their private automobiles in the garage. There-…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Plummer v. DillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  2. Indian Refining Co. v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  3. Muench v. HeinemannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Gasch v. RoundsWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Gibson v. SziepienskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Potts v. AmisWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Schock v. Ringling Bros. Etc.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Dobbie v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Dotson v. HaddockWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. McCulloch v. HortonMontana Supreme Court · 1936

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API