Legal Opinion

Hammack v. Monroe Street Lumber Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1956No. 33864PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

Appellant Hammack sued the respondent, Monroe Street Lumber Company, for personal injuries and damages to his automobile resulting from an automobile accident. Appellant’s employer, Union Iron Works, and *582the respondent and its employees were engaged in extra-hazardous employment under the compulsory provisions of the industrial insurance act. The court found, however, that appellant himself was covered only by the elective adoption provisions of that act.2 By answer, respondent pleaded immunity to the action pursuant to Laws of 1939, chapter 41, § 2, p. 121 [cf. RCW 51.24.010], set out in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Young v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Prince v. Saginaw Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Pryor v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Koreski v. Seattle Hardware Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Latimer v. Western MacHinery ExchangeWashington Supreme Court · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hammack v. Monroe Street Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Dominic Miller v. St. Regis Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Hammack v. Monroe Street Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Hammack v. Monroe Street Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API