Chrysler Motors Corp. v. Flowers
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAndersen, J.
Facts of Case
At issue here is whether Washington's lemon law (RCW 19.118) is applicable to automobiles such as the one sold to the purchaser in this case.
In November 1986, Chrysler Motors transferred a new 1987 Dodge Ramcharger 4x4, hereafter referred to as the automobile, to Chrysler's Denver, Colorado, zone office. The Denver zone office intended to use the automobile as a "field" vehicle, or a vehicle assigned to an employee for business and personal use. In December 1986 the Denver office assigned the automobile to a Chrysler employee who used it for 7 months, driving it more than 20,000…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Schmidt v. Cornerstone Investments, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- Garrison v. Washington State Nursing BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. NeherWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Green River Community College District No. 10 v. Higher Education Personnel BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Ford Motor Co. v. BarrettWashington Supreme Court · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thurston County v. Cooper Point Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Thurston County v. Cooper Point Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Arbitration of Mooberry v. MAGNUM MFG.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Mooberry v. Magnum Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Meyers v. Volvo Cars of North America, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.