Legal Opinion
Arbitration of Mooberry v. MAGNUM MFG.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided October 8, 2001No. 46295-4-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
32 P.3d 302 (2001)
In re the ARBITRATION OF Jerry D. MOOBERRY, Respondent,
v.
MAGNUM MANUFACTURING, INC., Appellant.
No. 46295-4-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
October 8, 2001.
Helen Regina Cullen, Seattle, J. Robert Leach, Anderson Hunter Law Firm, Everett, for Appellant.
Thomas Drake Bigsby, Everett, for Respondent.
2Per curiam
This appeal requires us to interpret certain provisions of RCW 19.118, Washington's "lemon law" statute. Under that statute, a person who purchases a new, but defective, motor home after June 30, 1998, cannot seek to have the faulty motor home replaced or repurchased by…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. WrightWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Omega National Insurance v. MarquardtWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Matter of Detention of ChorneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- McFreeze Corp. v. State, Dept. of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- McFreeze Corp. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Schoonover v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Schoonover v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Johnson v. KING COUNTY (METRO TRANSIT)Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Johnson v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. DupuisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012