Legal Opinion
Ziemba v. Hanover Insurance
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 5, 1995No. 13658PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
The named defendant1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a bench trial, in favor of the plaintiff on her uninsured motorist claim. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) granted the plaintiffs motion in limine, and (2) found that it was responsible, pursuant to the terms of the insurance contract regarding uninsured motorists, for the injuries and losses sustained by the plaintiff.
The following procedural history is relevant to our disposition of this appeal. On September 6, 1990, the plaintiff suffered injuries when the motor vehicle that she was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Collens v. New Canaan Water Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Skrzypiec v. NoonanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Expressway Associates II v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Baker v. CordiscoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Misiurka v. Maple Hill Farms, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ziemba v. Hanover InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995