Legal Opinion

Whinery v. Brown

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 12, 1905No. 5,408PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Erom Lake Superior Court; Harry B. Tuthill, Judge. Action by Edwin T. Brown against William J. Whinery. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBobinson, J.

Action by appellee for the recovery of money. The first paragraph of complaint avers that appellee employed appellant to. prosecute a claim for damages, and that appellant collected $100 which he retains and refuses to pay over on demand. In the second paragraph it is averred that appellee gave appellant, for collection, a claim for damages, and at the time it was agreed that for collecting the same appellee “was to pay the defendant the sum of $10 if $50 was recovered, and if more was recovered a fee should be paid to this defendant in *278the same proportion;” that appellant collected $100 and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. STANTON v. Embrey, AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Taylor v. BemissSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. French v. CunninghamIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Board of Commissioners v. JamesonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Newkirk v. ConeIllinois Supreme Court · 1857

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Draper v. ZebecIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Barelli v. LevinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. TrennepohlIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Doyle v. RingoIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Lancaster Township v. GravesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API