Rathman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent; Brown, J. Assumpsit by Lydia Rathman against the New Amsterdam Casualty Company on a policy of accident insurance. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.
This action was brought by plaintiff as the beneficiary named in an accident insurance policy issued by defendant to her husband, Paul Rathman, who, on the evening of July 10, 1912, lost his life by falling or jumping overboard from the steamer Kaiser Wilhelm II, while en route between Bremen and New York. No question is raised as to the pleadings. Her declaration is in assumpsit, upon the policy of insurance according to prescribed form. Defendant’s plea is the general issue, with special notices which raise the question of whether death of the assured, if proven, was accidental, or caused,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hahn v. National UnionMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Carr v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
- Bonewell v. North American Accident InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by13 opinions
- Evans v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Bellestri-Fontana v. New York Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Great Northern Life Ins. Co. v. VinceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Abbott v. Travelers InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- De Blieux v. Travelers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.