Legal Opinion

Bonewell v. North American Accident Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1911PublishedCited by 15 opinions

On rehearing.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

For former opinion, see 160 Mich. 137 *275(125 N. W. 59). Plaintiff urged a rehearing upon the following grounds:

“(1) Because the decision of the court is based upon a misapprehension of the facts, as shown by the record; (2) because the decision of the court regarding notice to the agent being notice to .the principal is not in accordance with the rule of law laid down by the court in similar cases; (3) because the court was misled by the brief and argument of counsel; (4) because the court’s decision is based upon grounds *of fraud on the part of the applicant and agents, Wrock & Watson, of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Flash v. ConnSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Houseman v. Girard Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. FreedmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Roderick v. McMeekinIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Bonewell v. North American Accident InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. CusickMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  2. General American Life Ins. v. WojciechowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. National Life & Accident Insurance v. NagelMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Chamberlain v. National Life & Accident Ins.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  5. Eaton v. National Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API