Legal Opinion

Hahn v. National Union

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1893PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This is an action of assumpsit, brought upon a benefit certificate for $3,000, issued by the defendant, a fraternal and beneficiary order, having its main office at Toledo, Ohio, with subordinate lodges in different cities, to one B. B. Hann, and payable in case of his death to his mother, the plaintiff. Application for membership was made by B. B. Hann, August 13, 1891.' He was examined by the medical examiner September 18, and the certificate was issued of the date of September 24. He died October 23, 1891, of cerebral meningitis. Payment was resisted by the defendant upon the claim that B.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Home Insurance v. CurtisMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Connor v. SquiersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1878

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Penn Mut. Life Ins. v. Mechanics' Savings Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  2. Blumenthal v. Berkshire Life-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Plumb v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Fitzgerald v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
  5. Sterling Insurance v. DanseySupreme Court of Virginia · 1954

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API