Harmon v. Telerent Leasing Corp.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Telerent Leasing Corporation filed a complaint against George Harmon d/b/a Valley Inn Motel. Thereafter, on March 1, 1976, the district court granted Telerent’s motion for summary judgment and Harmon has appealed.
In his answer to the complaint, Harmon advanced, inter alia, the affirmative defense that under NRS 80.210(1), Telerent could not maintain the action because it was not qualified to do business in the state.1 Neither Telerent’s pleadings, nor its affidavit in support of summary judgment, attempted to controvert Harmon’s contention.
A motion for summary judgment should not be…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Old West Enterprises, Inc. v. Reno Escrow CompanyNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Ottenheimer v. Real Estate Division of the Nevada Department of CommerceNevada Supreme Court · 1975
- Islandia, Inc. v. MarechekNevada Supreme Court · 1966
4Cited by2 opinions
- Lake at Las Vegas Investors Group, Inc. v. Pacific Malibu Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Lake At Las Vegas Investors Group, Inc. v. Pacific Malibu Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991