Pecorino v. Raymark Industries, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROOKSHIRE, Justice.
Summary judgment appeal.
This appeal is taken from a summary judgment proceeding. A summary judgment was granted in favor of the defendants below, who are Appellees and Cross-Appellants here. The granting of the motion for summary judgment was based upon the statute of limitations in an asbestos-mesothelioma case. The Appellant, at the threshold of her brief, characterizes this appeal thus:
“This is an appeal from a Summary Judgment granted in favor of the Defendants based upon the statute of limitations in an asbestos induced mesothe-lioma lawsuit.” (Emphasis added)
An…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- R & P Enterprises v. LaGuarta, Gavrel & Kirk, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
- Nelson v. KrusenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Otis Elevator Company v. WoodTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- Albert E. Albertson v. T.J. Stevenson & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Blannie S. Wilson, Administratrix of the Estate of Henry J. Wilson, Deceased v. Johns-Manville Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Childs v. HausseckerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Pustejovsky v. Rapid-American Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
- Potts v. Celotex Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1990
- Marinari v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.