Legal Opinion

Pecorino v. Raymark Industries, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided January 26, 1989No. 09-88-029 CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROOKSHIRE, Justice.

Summary judgment appeal.

This appeal is taken from a summary judgment proceeding. A summary judgment was granted in favor of the defendants below, who are Appellees and Cross-Appellants here. The granting of the motion for summary judgment was based upon the statute of limitations in an asbestos-mesothelioma case. The Appellant, at the threshold of her brief, characterizes this appeal thus:

“This is an appeal from a Summary Judgment granted in favor of the Defendants based upon the statute of limitations in an asbestos induced mesothe-lioma lawsuit.” (Emphasis added)

An…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. R & P Enterprises v. LaGuarta, Gavrel & Kirk, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Nelson v. KrusenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Otis Elevator Company v. WoodTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Albert E. Albertson v. T.J. Stevenson & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  5. Blannie S. Wilson, Administratrix of the Estate of Henry J. Wilson, Deceased v. Johns-Manville Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Childs v. HausseckerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Pustejovsky v. Rapid-American Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Potts v. Celotex Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Marinari v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API