Legal Opinion
State v. Atkins
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 19, 2010No. 64975-2-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
236 P.3d 897 (2010)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Phillip Van ATKINS, Appellant.
No. 64975-2-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
May 24, 2010.
Publication Ordered July 19, 2010.
Jodi R. Backlund, Manek R. Mistry, Backlund & Mistry, Olympia, WA, for Appellant.
Douglas P. Ruth, Lewis Co. Pros. Ofc., Chehalis, WA, for Respondent.
COX, J.
¶ 1 Phillip Atkins appeals his judgment and sentence, claiming that the information and "to convict" instruction for his felony harassment charge were deficient because they did not include an essential element of that crime. Because "true threat" is not…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Yates v. EvattSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. Rattana Keo PhuongCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State v. HolzknechtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.