Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 2013No. 86119-6PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtC. Johnson, J.

¶1 Petitioner Bryan Allen challenges his felony harassment conviction, raising three issues. The primary issue involves whether the trial court erred by not instructing the jury on the potential fallibility of cross-racial eyewitness identification. Based on the facts of this case, Allen cannot show the trial court violated his constitutional rights by refusing to give the cautionary instruction. A second issue involves whether the “true threat” requirement is an essential element of a harassment statute that must be pleaded in the information and included in the to-convict instruction. A…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Virginia v. BlackSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Perry v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. Rattana Keo PhuongCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. People v. BooneCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2017
  5. State v. Trey M.Washington Supreme Court · 2016

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API