Legal Opinion

Duclos v. Turner

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 7, 1942No. 4-6883PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This is a suit by appellant Duclos to enforce the specific performance of a contract to sell him a farm in Mississippi county. The contract was executed upon a form prescribed by the Federal Department of Agriculture, designated as F. S. A.-LE-188B. It appears to be, in substance, the same form of contract involved in the case of Killingsworth v. Tatum, 203 Ark. 354, 157 S. W. 2d 30, and its purpose was to enable persons who met the Government’s requirements to borrow money from the Government with which to purchase farm lands to be used as a home by the purchaser.

The relevant portions of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. El Dorado Ice & Planing Mill Co. v. KinardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  2. Hogan v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  3. Bracy v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  4. Killingsworth v. TatumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Keith v. City of Cave SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  2. Harrison v. KellySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  3. Magnolia Petroleum Company v. DudneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  4. Russell v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  5. Owens v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API