Legal Opinion

Dalton v. Franken Construction Companies, Inc.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 11, 1996No. 16475PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PICKARD, Judge.

1. Petitioner, Robert Hanford Dalton (Dalton), appeals the district court’s determination that he did not timely exercise his statutory right of redemption of a property which had been sold at a judicial sale. Dalton argues that he substantially complied with the time requirements of NMSA 1978, Section 39-5-18(A) (Repl.Pamp.1991) to effect a redemption of the property. Dalton further argues that the equities of the case are such that the district court abused its discretion when it denied Dalton’s petition for redemption. We affirm the decision of the district court.

FACTS

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gallegos v. WilkersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  2. United States v. LoosleyUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. JuddSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  4. Huston v. LewisUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Western Bank of Las Cruces v. MaloolyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Brown v. TrujilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Chapel v. NevittNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Cortez v. CortezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API