Legal Opinion

Allen v. Hudson

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 9, 1929No. 8514PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judge.

The facts in this case are practically without dispute' and are fairly stated in the briefs of both parties. May 1, 1919, E. M. Allen, appellant, and James A. Hudson, appellee, be came partners in an insurance business operated under tbe name of E. M. Allen Company. Allen had a 55 per cent, and Hudson had a 45 per cent, interest in the business. It was decided between them that a policy of insurance should be executed, on the life of each of the partners for the benefit of the partnership. Accordingly, the Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York issued two…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. BondurantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
  2. Lahman v. Burnes Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  3. Wellhouse v. United Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1929
  4. Harris v. NewsomCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gleckman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  2. Ayers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  3. Carpenter v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  4. Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  5. Love v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API