Swanne Soon Young Pang v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Chief Judge.
Pang appeals from a judgment and sentence by the district court after trial by jury resulted in a verdict of guilty on one of two counts charged.
The questions presented by the appeal are: (1) whether it was error for the trial judge to instruct the jury on aiding and abetting (accessory before the fact) where the indictment charges the defendant only with being a principal and (2) whether there is sufficient evidence to support the verdict of the jury.
Appellant Pang and two co-defendants, Weiler and Davis, were indicted on charges of violating the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Love v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Paul v. OatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Jeffrey Gaskins, AKA Jeffery GaskinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Charles Thomas Bryan and James Eston Echols. Appeal of Charles Thomas BryanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- James Gilbert Glass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
- James Norman Yeloushan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.