Legal Opinion

State v. Everette

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 2011No. 2010-1325PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’Connor, C J.

{¶ 1} In this appeal, we decide whether a videotape recording of the trial court proceedings filed in the court of appeals constitutes a “transcript” pursuant to App.R. 9(A) and R.C. 2953.21(A)(2) so as to trigger the 180-day time requirement for filing a petition for postconviction relief under the statute. For the reasons stated below, we hold that for purposes of determining when the 180-day time period for filing a postconviction-relief petition shall accrue, only the certified, written transcript constitutes a “transcript” under App.R. 9 and R.C. *3182953.21(A)(2) when both…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Brenders v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Brookwood Presbyterian Church v. Ohio Department of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. HollingsworthOhio Supreme Court · 2008

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Dillon v. Farmers Ins. of Columbus, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. PerkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. State v. ButcherOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. State v. HawkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. State v. AndrewsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API