Legal Opinion
Weinberg v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 14, 2002No. 01 C 1139PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KEYS, United States Magistrate Judge.
Currently before the Court is Plaintiff Mark Weinberg’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff charges that the City’s prohibition on peddling within 1000 feet of the United Center (the “peddlers’ ordinance”) violates his rights under the First Amendment. Plaintiff also attacks the Chicago Municipal Code’s licensing ordinance for peddlers (“peddlers’ licensing ordinance”) as an unconstitutional prior restraint on his First Amendment rights. For the reasons set forth below, the Plaintiffs Motion is Denied. The Court finds that…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mark G. Weinberg v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Second Hand Tunes v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
- Church of the American Knights of Ku Klux Klan v. City of GaryDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2002
- Mark G. Weinberg v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Mark G. Weinberg v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.