Legal Opinion
Mark G. Weinberg v. City of Chicago
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 20, 2002No. 02-1372PublishedCited by 105 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Mark Weinberg brought a suit challenging the constitutionality of Chicago’s peddling law after being threatened with arrest for violating the ordinance. Weinberg argued the law, which prohibits peddling on public sidewalks in certain areas of the city, is unconstitutional under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Both parties moved for summary judgment and the district court granted summary judgment in favor of the City of Chicago. Weinberg appeals, arguing the district court erred in granting summary judgment and that the peddling…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Sanford v. MemberWorks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Alfredo Kuba, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. 1-A Agricultural AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Moses Boyd, Jr. v. Illinois State PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Edith Milestone v. City of MonroeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Richard P. Hobbs v. County of Westchester and Mr. Montalto, Director of Playland Amusement ParkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.