Legal Opinion

Line Material Co. v. Brady Electric & Mfg. Co.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided May 14, 1924No. 1645PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Line Material Company against the Brady Electric & Manufacturing Company.

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, District Judge.

Patent No. 930,527 was issued to Charles 5. Burge on August 10, 1909. It relates to automatically adjustable strain insulator fixtures for attachment to houses. The bill charges tire defendant with infringement, and seeks an injunction, accounting, and damages. It is stipulated by the parties that the defendant manu*823factured and sold in this district insulator fixtures exemplified by defendant’s device, and that the allegations of the bill respecting the incorporation and residence of the respective parties are true, and that the plaintiff is the owner of the patent in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Remington Cash Register Co. v. National Cash Register Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1925
  2. Sidney Blumenthal & Co. v. Salt's Textile Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1927
  3. Trico Products Corporation v. Ace Products CorporationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1929
  4. In re HornseyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  5. Gillette Safety Razor Co. v. Standard Safety Razor Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API