Legal Opinion
Trico Products Corporation v. Ace Products Corporation
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 15, 1929No. 1950PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURROWS, District Judge.
This suit is brought in equity for an injunction and for profits and damages on account of the alleged infringement by the defendants of patent No. 1,659,496, issued to Trico Products Corporation, the plaintiff herein, as assignee of John R. Oishei and Henry Hueber, for windshield wiper dated February 14, 1928, on an application filed March 29, 1927. The action is also brought for unfair competition, the bill of complaint alleging that the defendants unfairly sold windshield wipers made in imitation of wipers manufactured by the plaintiff, and that defendants unfairly…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fisher Stoves, Inc. v. All Nighter Stove Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Powder Power Tool Corporation v. Powder Actuated Tool Company, Inc., and Frank J. KlunkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
- Strong-Scott Mfg. Co. v. WellerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Phillips v. McCauleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Trico Products Corp. v. Rico Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.