Legal Opinion

In re Hornsey

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 22, 1931No. 2687PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

The application in this appeal relates to a process of reducing iron oxide materials to metallic iron and involves the consideration of three claims, 2, 56, and 57, of which claim 2 is illustrative and reads as follows:

2. The process of reducing iron oxide materials to metallic iron without melting, which consists in first heating the ore in a state of division in an internally heated inclined rotating cylinder to approximately the temperature of reaction, in discharging the heated ore into a second, reducing, inclined rotating cylinder, introducing fuel into said second cylinder, and also…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frederick Iron & Steel Co. v. Sanford Riley Stoker Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1923
  2. Line Material Co. v. Brady Electric & Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API