Legal Opinion
Sidney Blumenthal & Co. v. Salt's Textile Mfg. Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 12, 1927No. Nos. 1817, 1819PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, District Judge.
In the first suit, No. 1817, which was brought on September 3, 1925, the Blumenthal Company charges the Salt’s Company with infringement of two process patents, one to Stolzenherg, No. I, 521,259, issued December 30, 1924, and one to Blumenthal, No. 1,548,819, issued August II, 1925, as well as three design patents all issued to Gowans, the first on December 2, 1924, No. 66,119, the second on May 12, 1925, No. 67,279, and the third issued on September 8, 1925, No. 68,138. All of these patents were issued to the Blumenthal Company as assignee of the respective inventors.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- White v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Dunbar v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Johnson Co. v. Philad Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Denaro v. Maryland Baking Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1930
- Winget Kickernick Co. v. La Mode Garment Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1930
- Philad Co. v. VanattaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1939
- Werder v. Continental Can Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.