Legal Opinion
3M Innovative Properties Co. v. Avery Dennison Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 15, 2002No. CIV 01-1781 (DSD/FLN)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court upon plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction, defendant’s motion to submit the supplemental declaration of Anthony McHugh, and plaintiffs motion for leave to submit the supplemental declaration of Charles A. Calisto. Based on a review of the file, record and proceedings herein, and for the reasons stated, the court denies plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction, grants defendant’s motion to submit the supplemental declaration of Anthony McHugh, and grants plaintiffs motion for leave to submit the supplemental declaration…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- 3m Innovative Properties Company and Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Avery Dennison CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Travelers Express Co. v. Transaction Tracking Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
- Vision-Ease Lens, Inc. v. Essilor International SADistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2004
- Hertz Corp. v. ANC Rental Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- 3m Innovative Properties Company and Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Avery Dennison CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004