Vision-Ease Lens, Inc. v. Essilor International SA
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
Introduction
Preliminary relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 65 is a “drastic and extraordinary remedy that is not to be routinely granted.” Intel Corp. v. ULSI Sys. Tech. Inc., 995 F.2d 1566, 1568 (Fed.Cir.1993). Plaintiff Vision-Ease Lens, Inc. (“Vision-Ease”) seeks a preliminary injunction against Defendants Essilor International SA and Essilor of America, Inc. (collectively, “Essilor”) to prevent the introduction of a competing eyeglass lens. Vision-Ease alleges that Essilor’s lens is the result of a breach of a confidential…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Watkins Incorporated v. Lloyd M. Lewis and Sandra G. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Gelco Corp. v. Coniston PartnersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Perfect 10 v. Google, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2006
- Berry v. Hennepin CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
- Select Comfort Corporation v. BaxterDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
- Zikar Holdings LLC v. RuhlandDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024