Legal Opinion
3m Innovative Properties Company and Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Avery Dennison Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 20, 2004No. 03-1203PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge CLEVENGER. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge MICHEL.
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellants 3M Innovative Properties Company and Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (collectively “3M”) sued Defendant-Appellee Avery Dennison (“Avery”) for infringement of claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 5,897,-930 (“the '930 patent”) in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. After construing disputed claim terms, the district court entered summary judgment in favor of Avery, concluding that Avery did not infringe, as a matter…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Ccs Fitness, Inc. v. Brunswick Corporation and Its Division Life FitnessCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Scimed Life Systems, Inc. v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Texas Digital Systems, Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Johnson Worldwide Associates, Inc. v. Zebco Corporation and Brunswick CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Martek Biosciences Corp. v. Nutrinova, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Computer Docking Station Corp. v. Dell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Biogen Idec, Inc. v. GlaxoSmithKline LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Toshiba Corp. v. Imation Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.